This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Current (non-) state of gdbserver

To: jtc at redback dot com
Subject: Re: Current (non-) state of gdbserver
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:45:33 -0400
Cc: Quality Quorum <qqi at world dot std dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <Pine.SGI.4.21.0107111805580.4996-100000@world.std.com> <5m7kxej6mr.fsf@jtc.redback.com>

> 
> Quality> It will be nice to add thread support rightaway.
> 
> Indeed.  All of these primitives need to be context/process/thread aware.


Starting at the frame we have:

	a frame has a thread
	a thread has a target

so a target could potentially manage one or more threads.
Makeing sense?  Sounding good in theory?

	Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Current (non-) state of gdbserver
  - From: Quality Quorum

References:
- Re: Current (non-) state of gdbserver
  - From: Quality Quorum
- Re: Current (non-) state of gdbserver
  - From: J.T. Conklin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]