This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [5.1] Re: status of gdb on Tru64 5.1?
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [5.1] Re: status of gdb on Tru64 5.1?
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at act-europe dot fr>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:03:10 +0200
- Cc: "'gdb at sources dot redhat dot com'" <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>, "Coleman, Michael" <MKC at Stowers-Institute dot org>, knelson at icis-inc dot com, gdb at thewrittenword dot com
- References: <95C2153C4FD3D311B34D0008C786B0AE8780C6@exchkc01.stowers-institute.org> <3BB2A775.3000108@cygnus.com>
> Is there an update on this? I.e. does GDB work on True64? (hmm,
> perhaphs, I've already asked this question).
I recently sent the following message to somebody enquiring the status
of GDB on Tru64:
<<
> Does anyone know if/when the tru64 5.1 patch for gdb will be added? I just
> pulled down the latest CVS and it's not in there.
I am not clear about the patch you are talking about. The first patch I
submitted for Tru64 5.1 did not meet the GDB standards. For one thing, I
had to break it down into smaller pieces. But most of the important
changes were better done by Nick Duffeck, so his changes were checked
in, and I only integrated small pieces that his patch did not contain.
> Alternatively, if Joel's patch works, can one of you send me the
> alpha-osf5.mh patch (or diff from alpha-osf3.mh)? (It wasn't included in
> Joel's original post.)
The bad news is that I just tried today's snapshot and I also failed to
build it. I don't think this is because of the lack of the
alpha-osf5.mh. For me, the build failed in alpha-nat.c, where it fails
to find the EF_* macros. This is probably a minor problem, these macros
are defined inside /usr/include/machine/reg.h (BTW, on our machine,
"machine" is actually a link to "alpha"). And it is #include'd from
alpha-nat.c, they are just conditionalized by
#if defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_EXCEPTION_FRAME)
I unfortunately don't have much more time at the moment to help you more
on this issue. I hope this will help you making some progress.
>>
I'm not sure anymore, but I thought that Nick's patch was allowing GDB
to build on both Tru64 4.0 and 5.1... Strangely, I even remember being
able to rebuild it myself on our machines. Either I have incorrect
memories, or maybe a later change broke the build, or we forgot
to check-in something.
For the compilation problem, I still have the original fix that I sent
with my first message. I can clean it to satisfy Andrew's comments, and
resubmit it. But I would prefer to some feedback from others, to see if
they have the same build problems or not. At the moment, I am still
unclear whether it is local to our machine, or a forgotten change.
--
Joel