This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC/RFA] fix cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
- To: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] fix cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
- From: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 19:47:57 -0700
- CC: Pierre Muller <muller at cerbere dot u-strasbg dot fr>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>
- References: <"Pierre <3.0.6.32.20011004012430.010f56b0"@idefix.wisa.be> <4.2.0.58.20011005095752.00d0db60@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20011010221023.B13834@redhat.com>
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:00:09PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
> >Could someone, (Christopher ?) explains us why tm-cygwin.h includes
> >tm-i386v.h when as Mark Kettenis said, Cygwin is not derived from
> >System V ?
>
> I am sorry but I really can't explain why tm-cygwin.h includes
> tm-i386v.h. I believe that predates my maintainership.
Probably because Windows uses COFF, as does SVR3, so in a very loose
sense, Cygwin does have an ancestral relationship with SVR3.
Ironically, it doesn't look like there are any actual vestiges of
COFFness left in tm-i386v.h
Stan