This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFC/RFA] fix cygwin GDB "long long" return value error

To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFA] fix cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 00:34:34 -0400
Cc: Pierre Muller <muller at cerbere dot u-strasbg dot fr>, Mark Kettenis <kettenis at science dot uva dot nl>
References: <Pierre <3.0.6.32.20011004012430.010f56b0@idefix.wisa.be> <4.2.0.58.20011005095752.00d0db60@ics.u-strasbg.fr> <20011010221023.B13834@redhat.com>

On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 10:10:23PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Fri, Oct 05, 2001 at 12:00:09PM +0200, Pierre Muller wrote:
>>Could someone, (Christopher ?) explains us why tm-cygwin.h includes
>>tm-i386v.h when as Mark Kettenis said, Cygwin is not derived from
>>System V ?
>
>I am sorry but I really can't explain why tm-cygwin.h includes
>tm-i386v.h.  I believe that predates my maintainership.
>
>However, if you have tested your patch and everything works fine,
>please check it in.  I've verified that gdb seems to work ok
>but I haven't run it through the test suite.

Nevermind.  I just checked this in.

Thanks,
cgf

References:
- [RFC] cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
  - From: Pierre Muller
- [RFC/RFA] fix cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
  - From: Pierre Muller
- Re: [RFC/RFA] fix cygwin GDB "long long" return value error
  - From: Christopher Faylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]