This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions
- From: Iso-H <jd at ts dot ray dot fi>
- To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 15:14:00 +0200 (EET)
- Subject: Re: gdb-5.x and step over inline functions
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Iso-H wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to step over inline functions
> > when using gdb >= 5.1 ? Some (commandline or other)option
> > perhaps?
>
> Doesn't `until' do that? That is, given that line 123 calls an inline
> function, and line 124 is the one after the inline function returns, you
> should be able to say "until 124" and get what you want. Does that work?
It isn't same; for example if I want to say: "list f_MyFunction"
and if there is (==beginning of "f_MyFunction") some objects
which have inline constructors I get list of those constructor(s)
NOT list of "f_MyFunction" as I expected/wanted. Besides,
I have to check what is the line number from source code by editor
because gdb can't show that line to me.
Same goes with "next"; if I set breakpoint: "b f_MyFunction"
I don't get what I want, because I end up to inside of those
f*king inline constructor(s) again when breakpoint is reached!
All this works with gdb-5.0, so gdb-5.1.x behaves
differently here...
>
> > I have used gcc option "-g3" with compilations and
> > my host/target arch is GNULinux-alpha (ev56/ev67) but
> > I think that this "step over inline functions" problem
> > exist on other archs too.
>
> Does it help to use -gstabs+ instead of -g3? (I assume the latter is a
> synonym for -gdwarf-2 on your system.)
I tried, but it didn't help...
>
--
Iso-H