Re: gdb/633: fully qualified pathnames in solib_map_sections() andremote debugging

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at ges dot redhat dot com>]

> At the moment, I like the first approach better because it's simpler.
> I'd prefer that we wait on the more complicated approach until a need
> is demonstrated for the additional complexity.
>
>
> > Adding a local/remote test is going to be easier.
>
> Do we already have such a test?
Well, looking at some finally dead hacks, ....

int
remote_Z_write_wp_packet_supported_p (void)
{
  struct remote_state *rs = get_remote_state ();
  /* Don't even think about it if the remote target isn't selected.  */
  /* FIXME: cagney/2002-05-19: This shouldn't be necessary - the
     WATCHPOINT methods should be in the target vector.  Ulgh!  */
  if (target_shortname == NULL
      || strcmp (target_shortname, "remote") != 0)
    return 0;

notice that the problem it was trying to avoid was with ``target sim''. 
 So in the above the question is no longer local/remote but local VS 
remote VS sim VS ....

Andrew