Re: RFC: Two small remote protocol extensions

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 10:24:28AM -0400, Quality Quorum wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> > Lets get rid of the easy one (...) `Hg':
> >
> > ``
> >
> > @item @code{Hg}@var{id} --- set general thread
> > @cindex @code{Hc} packet
> >
> > Select the general thread.  Register and memory read and write
> > operations apply to the most recently selected general thread.
> 
> 
> ????? Memory is shared between threads, isn't it so ????
> 
> IMHO, a multi-process debugging is a very different animal from a
> multi-thread debugging and lumping them together only creates more
> problems.

Registers aren't, though.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer