This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: setfault calling functions within gdb
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email dot unc dot edu>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 10 Sep 2002 01:36:14 -0500
- Subject: Re: setfault calling functions within gdb
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209092345270.13388-100000@Chrestomanci>
I don't see anything obviously wrong with what you're doing (although
someone is certain to pop up and correct me). Could you file this as
a bug report at http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/, so it won't get
lost?
Faheem Mitha <faheem@email.unc.edu> writes:
> Dear People,
>
> I'm having problems calling functions from within gdb. Can someone tell me
> what I am doing wrong? Consider the following innocuous program
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> #include<vector>
> #include <iostream>
>
> using std::vector;
> using std::cout;
>
> typedef vector<double> Point;
> void print(Point pt);
>
> int main()
> {
> Point foo(3,1.0);
> //print(foo);
> }
>
> void print(Point pt)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> cout << "[";
> for(i=0; i < pt.size(); i++)
> {
> cout << pt[i];
> cout << ",";
> }
> cout << "]";
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> When I set a breakpoint after the definition of foo and call
> print(foo) I get a segfault. There appears to be nothing wrong with
> this function, since print(foo) when compiled into the function works
> as expected. Also, "print foo[0]" works fine. There seem to be two
> possibilities; a) I am doing something wrong, b) this is a bug in
> gdb. I'm hoping it is the former. I dimly recall calling functions
> successfully sometime in the past, but I can't remember whether it was
> in C or C++ code.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is really frustrating!
> Output from gdb follows. I'm using gdb, gcc-3.0 on Debian Sarge. The
> respective versions are
>
> ii gdb 5.2.cvs20020401-6 The GNU Debugger
> ii g++-3.0 3.0.4-9 The GNU C++ compiler.
>
> I locally compiled the slightly more recent version of gdb from August
> which is in unstable, but I get the same behaviour.
>
> Faheem.
>
> (gdb) call print(foo)
> [
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0804a1a4 in print(std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >)
> (pt=0x804f008) at test.cc:22
> The program being debugged was signaled while in a function called
> >From GDB.
> GDB remains in the frame where the signal was received.
> To change this behavior use "set unwindonsignal on"
> Evaluation of the expression containing the function
> (print(std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >)) will be
> abandoned.
> (gdb)