This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:20:30PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > >>Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:47:11 -0400
> > >>From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>
> > >>
> > >>I'd like to float the idea of moving all the generic dummy frame code
> > >>into a new file dummy.[hc].
> > >
> > >
> > >Yes, but I'd suggest to call the files something other than dummy.*,
> > >lest someone thinks they are junk ;-)
> >
> > But then I can't have a function called ``dummy_spit()'' (OZ? expression
> > for blowing one's fuse).
> >
> > More seriously, I'm struggling for a better name: ``generic'' ``gdf''
> > ``dummy-frame'', ... I guess the last one?
>
> I think dummy-frame works well.
>
infcall.[ch] ? (which goes with infcmd.c)
Elena
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer