This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>,Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>,Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:07:30 -0400
Subject: Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
References: <3D938E6F.6090809@redhat.com> <2427-Fri27Sep2002201112+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <3D94A16E.6010409@redhat.com> <20020927182200.GA16046@nevyn.them.org> <15764.42249.38594.693286@localhost.redhat.com> <1020927185903.ZM24287@localhost.localdomain>

On Sep 27,  2:35pm, Elena Zannoni wrote:

 > I think dummy-frame works well.

infcall.[ch] ? (which goes with infcmd.c)

For hand_function_call() et.al. (which I can never find 'cos it is hidden in valops.c)? Ok.

For dummy-frame.[ch] I'm thinking of just the ``struct dummy_frame'' object code found in blockframe.c.

I like this one.

I don't mind dummy-frame.[hc] either, but it's not 8.3 compliant.

It's ok.  It will be reduced to: dummy-fr.[ch].

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Elena Zannoni

References:
- RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Elena Zannoni
- Re: RFC: dummy.[hc] and ``struct dummy''
  - From: Kevin Buettner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]