Re: set processor command

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>]

Andrew Cagney writes:
 > > Hi folks,
 > > 
 > > I did a small comparison between gdb 5.0, 5.1 and gdb 5.2.1 (configured as
 > > --target=powerpc-unknown-elf, solaris hosted) regarding the 'set processor'
 > > command. The output is:
 > > 
 > > gdb 5.0:
 > > --------
 > > GDB knows about the following PowerPC and RS6000 variants:
 > >   ppc-uisa  PowerPC UISA - a PPC processor as viewed by user-level code
 > >   rs6000    IBM RS6000 ("POWER") architecture, user-level view
 > >   403       IBM PowerPC 403
 > >   403GC     IBM PowerPC 403GC
 > >   505       Motorola PowerPC 505
 > >   860       Motorola PowerPC 860 or 850
 > >   601       Motorola PowerPC 601
 > >   602       Motorola PowerPC 602
 > >   603       Motorola/IBM PowerPC 603 or 603e
 > >   604       Motorola PowerPC 604 or 604e
 > >   750       Motorola/IBM PowerPC 750 or 740
 > > 
 > > gdb 5.1:
 > > --------
 > > Requires an argument. Valid arguments are rs6000:6000, rs6000:rs1, rs6000:rsc, rs6000:rs2, powerpc:common, powerpc:603, powerpc:EC603e, powerpc:604, powerpc:403, powerpc:601, powerpc:620, powerpc:630, powerpc:a35, powerpc:rs64ii, powerpc:rs64iii, powerpc:7400, powerpc:MPC8XX, auto.
 > > 
 > > gdb 5.2.1:
 > > ----------
 > > Requires an argument. Valid arguments are rs6000:6000, rs6000:rs1, rs6000:rsc, rs6000:rs2, powerpc:common, auto.
 > > 
 > > As you may see, the definition of the variants of powerpc vary considerably
 > > from one version to another, and I would like to know what will be the
 > > futur of this command: it looks like it is being deprecated, with less and
 > > less variants supported. Is that true ? Or is it only that the existing code
 > > is more generic ?
 > 
 > The code was rationalied (across a number of architectures) and also 
 > made very generic.  GDB ``supports'' any architecture/machine that is both:
 > 
 > - known by bfd
 > - known by gdb
 > 
 > It's included in the list.  The names are obtained via a query to BFD.
 > 
 > A useful new feature (BFD and GDB) might be to also obtain a brief 
 > description of the architecture/machine.


Yes, but I think that the 5.2.1 version was only returning the rs6000
variants, which was a bug, and I think this was fixed when I did the
e500 support.  The CVS head version of gdb returns the following now,
which is the correct set:

(gdb) set processor
Requires an argument. Valid arguments are rs6000:6000, rs6000:rs1, rs6000:rsc, rs6000:rs2, powerpc:common, powerpc:common64, powerpc:603, powerpc:EC603e, powerpc:604, powerpc:403, powerpc:601, powerpc:620, powerpc:630, powerpc:a35, powerpc:rs64ii, powerpc:rs64iii, powerpc:7400, powerpc:e500, powerpc:MPC8XX, auto.

Elena


 > 
 > Andrew
 >