This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [5.3] Does GDB build on GNU/Linux s390?


On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:29:59PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:08:33PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >
> >>>On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:43:29AM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>>
> >
> >>>>See:
> >>>>http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gdb&pr=513
> >>>>
> >>>>Is anyone able to confirm / deny that GDB can be built on GNU/Linux 
> >>s390?
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Well, it built on S/390 on 8/18... I haven't tried since then, however.
> >
> >>
> >>(18/8) that's good enough for me.
> >
> >
> >Except the PR you just closed is a different problem than gdb/513
> >was...
> 
> The bug report was against GDB 5.2.1 and s390.  That will never build so 
> I don't see any reason for leaving it open.  If it turns out that GDB 
> 5.3 branch doesn't build on s390 GNU/Linux then, I'm pretty sure, we'll 
> get a new bug report.

The file he was reporting a bug on has not changed noticeably since
5.2.1, nor have any of its headers.  If the definitions were missing on
his system they will still be missing, and we need to figure out where
to get them.  It's hardly a duplicate report.

Also, I though 5.2.1 _did_ used to build on S/390...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]