This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
- From: "Sunil Alankar" <sunil dot alankar at coware dot com>
- To: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: <gdb at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 10:10:05 -0800
- Subject: RE: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
Yes. GDB 5.1 sets break point on func() with the same binary/compiler. 5.2
and 5.3 also work on Linux but have problems on Solaris.
--Sunil
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Jacobowitz [mailto:drow@mvista.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 9:31 AM
To: Sunil Alankar
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: GDB 5.2/5.3 breakpoint bug
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:07:04PM -0800, Sunil Alankar wrote:
> //-------------------------------------------------------------
> #include <systemc.h>
>
> SC_MODULE(top)
> {
> public:
>
> sc_in_clk iclk;
>
> void func()
> {
> printf (".");
> }
>
> SC_CTOR(top)
> {
> SC_METHOD(func);
> sensitive_pos << iclk;
> dont_initialize();
> }
> };
Func is an inline method. Does gdb 5.1 really set a breakpoint on it?
Using the exact same binary and compiler? I find that pretty
surprising, since there is no symbol for it anywhere; GDB's support for
inline methods is pretty lousy right now.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer