This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: how canonical are template names?
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: carlton at math dot stanford dot edu, shebs at apple dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:42:26 -0500
- Subject: Re: how canonical are template names?
- References: <200301110106.h0B16rd31712@duracef.shout.net>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 07:06:53PM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> Since a C++ parser is a bitch of a thing to write, is there any chance
> that Mark Mitchell's new C++ parser can be re-used in gdb?
>
> The interesting part would be doing name resolution out of the
> symbol table information rather than internal compiler information.
This is something that I _definitely_ intend to pursue. In order to do
it we'd have to find a way to add the flexibility GDB needs without
impacting the performance of the C++ parser....
Of course, for this to become a reality is sorta way down my list;
it'll require some fundamental architecturing we don't have.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer