This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Clean up gdb.c++ tests for dwarf 1
- From: David Carlton <carlton at math dot stanford dot edu>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: fnasser at redhat dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Date: 05 Feb 2003 13:36:56 -0800
- Subject: Re: Clean up gdb.c++ tests for dwarf 1
- References: <200302052130.h15LUHB10715@duracef.shout.net>
On Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:30:17 -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain
<mec@shout.net> said:
> My preference order is (1) - (2) - (3) - (4).
I agree. There's no reason to fix C++ DWARF 1 support that I can see,
so (4) is bad. We're trying to clean up xfails; I don't think those
xfails give us any useful information, so we might as well get rid of
them, so (3) is bad. (1) and (2) seem approximately equally desirable
to me; if (1) is easier, then we should just go with that. There's no
reason to spend any more time on this issue than is absolutely
necessary.
David Carlton
carlton@math.stanford.edu