This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
At Thu, 20 Feb 2003 04:04:59 +0000 (UTC), "Andrew Cagney" wrote:
Chris,
"Uh oh..."
I'm about to start submitting a very large number of MIPS simulators. One is called the `r5900'. Given the clear conflict of interest here (RHAT vs FSF) I'd rather drop MIPS maintenance and, instead, submit this as a normal developer
Obviously, if you think you have cause for concern about conflict of interest, best that you do what you feel is appropriate.
However, this makes me wonder: do you think _I_ should feel concerned about conflict of interest regarding contributing/merging SB-1 and related simulator changes? If so, well, who's left maintaining the MIPS sim? 8-)
I think it's quite appropriate for the maintainer to be an active developer (and contributor), with an interest in making the simulator better and more featureful, FWIW.
:model:::mips32:mipsisa32: :model:::mips64:mipsisa64: :model:::r5900:mips5900: :model:::r7900:mips7900: :model:::r3900:mips3900: :model:::tx19:tx19: :model:::vr4120:mips4120: :model:::vr5400:mips5400: :model:::vr5500:mips5500: :model:::mdmx:mdmx: :model:::r4900:mips4900: :model:::xxxx:mipsYYYY (still waiting on this one ...).
(I should really drop MIPS maintenance anyway, but now is a good oportunity :-).
*sigh* you have much more experience than I, obviously, so this is a loss, but I understand that you're probably over-stretched.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |