This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [maint] Guidelines for experimental branches


Diego Novillo wrote:
In article <3E648828 dot 3080502 at suse dot cz>, Michal Ludvig wrote:

Is it necessary to have the date in the name of the branch? IMHO it's fine for the branchpoint, as well as for mergepoints, but for the branch itself it's useless. People could much better remember words than 8-digits chunks and having to look on the webpage everytime, when I want to check out a branch is boring.

If the branch is long lived, you may want to re-create it more than once for performance reasons. As you get farther and farther from the branchpoint, CVS operations get increasingly slower. If dates are too long, you could also use 2-3 digit numbers.

So, could we say, that the date in there it optional?


Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o     * mludvig at suse dot cz
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]