This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, jbuck at synopsys dot com
- Cc: ac131313 at redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, dj at redhat dot com,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com, mrs at apple dot com,neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 18:23:56 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Libiberty license roundup (questions/potential problems)
> The only reason for using something other than the GPL is if a function
> turns out to be needed in a language support library as well. Otherwise
> it suffices if the license is GPL or GPL-compatible.
Well of course I understand the abstract principle here, the issue is how
does it apply in this case.