This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

int foo (); vs int foo (void);

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:06:34 -0400
Subject: int foo (); vs int foo (void);

Ok, so I knew there was a reason for prefering:

static void
foo (void)
{
}

over

static void
foo ()
{
}

other than that `the former is strict ISO C'. -Wmissing-prototypes gets grumpy if it sees the second form. I'd assume that the corresponding ARI check was added as a cheap -Wmissing-prototypes check.

enjoy,
Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- int foo (); vs int foo (void);
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]