This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 10:39:41AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
The initial status of each register is drawn from the CIE, and not the FDE.
I understand that.
If GCC is going to move forward with optimizations that involve local functions not complying to the ABI, it will need to supply complete INITIAL_INSTRUCTIONS information.
WHY?
I just gave you an argument why that information doesn't do you any particular good, NO MATTER WHAT THE ABI IS. Please refute it rather than ignoring it.
Moreover, the algorithm I suggested that you use -- assume saved --
is also completely independant of the ABI, so its' not like GDB needs to hard code ABI specific information either.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |