This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Register sets


   Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:13:39 -0400
   From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>

   > >>As for the architecture, supply_regset needs this.  It might, for 
   > >>instance, be an x86-64 method supplying registers to an i386 register 
   > >>cache.
   > >
   > >
   > >It needs the regcache's architecture, but I don't believe it needs any
   > >other.  The method will be defined for a particular regcache layout,
   > >which incorporates all of the information it needs about the other
   > >involved architecture.  We could get the regcache's architecture from
   > >the regcache, or pass it explicitly.
   > 
   > That's the architecture mark was passing in.  The alternative is a 
   > larger table of regcache X regset maps.

   No, Mark was passing in the core's architecture != the regcache's
   architecture.

Indeed I was, and it's the wrong thing to do.

Mark


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]