This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Register sets

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>,Mark Kettenis <kettenis at chello dot nl>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:16:47 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Register sets
References: <200308232249.h7NMnvhh090154@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20030824164347.GA17520@nevyn.them.org> <200308252234.h7PMYqFu001245@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <3F4B8173.1000302@redhat.com> <20030826165547.GA22836@nevyn.them.org> <86he3xrkjb.fsf@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <20030904125514.GA2577@nevyn.them.org> <vt2oexyzswx.fsf@zenia.home> <3F5D5C5D.4070809@redhat.com> <vt21xupx4sz.fsf@zenia.home>

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:

Er, this isn't a closure (at least not in the sense specified on
bfd@). Rather this is an object and so might as well be implemented in
more of an object style - pass the "struct regset" as the first
parameter.

Not sure I think the distinction is too meaningful.

Sorry, can you expand?

> You should

probably post a specific suggestion that shows what you're after.

Take a quick glance at any one of GDB's objects (regcache, gdbarch, reggroups, serial, ...) and the basic technique should be clear.

Andrew

References:
- Re: [RFC] Register sets
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [RFC] Register sets
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: [RFC] Register sets
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: [RFC] Register sets
  - From: Jim Blandy

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]