This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GDB schedule.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 17:05:59 -0400
Subject: Re: GDB schedule.
References: <200310061954.h96JsfCP008508@duracef.shout.net> <3F81D598.4070601@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:50:32PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >I would rather skip gdb 6.0.1 unless something happens in the field
> >that mandates it.  Less work on the branch => more resources for HEAD.
> 
> Apparently location expressions don't work (I'm wondering why the test 
> results didn't identify this, sigh).
> 
> The fix is small so its the sort of thing that can be cheaply pushed 
> into 6.0.1.
> 
> However, yes, given the choice, I'd also also prefer to not do a 6.0.1.

Ditto.  Location expressions do work.  Location expressions describing
function parameters do not work; GCC doesn't generate them.  Yet.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

References:
- Re: GDB schedule.
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: GDB schedule.
  - From: Andrew Cagney

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]