This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: FW: tracepoint frames
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb at redhat dot com>
- To: "Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc)" <mark dot newman at lmco dot com>
- Cc: gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 06 Oct 2003 23:19:38 -0500
- Subject: Re: FW: tracepoint frames
- References: <F56FBA314E8E5A41895F0DA8F6716A6D02A4C5@EMSS04M11.us.lmco.com>
"Newman, Mark (N-Superior Technical Resource Inc)" <mark.newman@lmco.com> writes:
> > Right, but GDB could request more information from the stub when it
> > creates the tracepoint. The stub shouldn't have to collect
> > anything at
> > all that GDB didn't tell it to.
> >
>
> That is an interesting point! This could be left up to the user.
>
> Would that be acceptable to the community?
If I understand what's been said, that's the way the existing
tracepoint support works --- you have to tell it everything you want
to collect. If you have selected a tracepoint hit and you ask for
something that wasn't collected, you get an error.