This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?

From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
Cc: mec at shout dot net, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 11:26:32 -0400
Subject: Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?
References: <200310202156.h9KLuRKV001659@duracef.shout.net> <3F94640A.4010807@redhat.com> <7494-Tue21Oct2003074534+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>

Right. So how about

   (gdb) info registers
   No program or core file to debug, so no registers.

The point at which the error is detected and thrown is a long way from "info registers" so customizing it to mention ", so no registers" will be painful.

Explicit mention of both program and core file would be helpful though.

Andrew

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: "No registers" or "No inferior to debug"?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]