This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++/Java regressions


Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > If it helps, that's more or less what my libiberty C++ demangler does.
> > It first translate the name into a simple tree structure, and then
> > walks the tree translating it into a string.  I could expose the tree,
> > although it would have to be documented a bit better.
> 
> Oh, so it's already two-pass?  If we could work out an API for the
> tree, then GDB could build and supply trees to get a canonical form
> back from the demangler.  That has the added bonus of not needing to
> post-process the demangler output (if we know that we've got a GNU v3
> name and thus this demangler was used, of course - v2 would still need
> to be parsed).  That sounds like an ideal solution.

I've been wanting something like this for a long time, too.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]