This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com,cagney at gnu dot org,gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 16 Dec 2003 08:31:08 +0200
Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
References: <20031215062230.CD6E94B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> <ufzfmy452.fsf@elta.co.il> <20031215155111.GA13947@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>

> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:51:11 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> 
> By the way, is there any reason DJGPP couldn't be tested in Bochs,
> qemu, vmware, plex86, or some other new system emulator I haven't heard
> of yet?

I don't know about these emulators.  In general, if they can run
DOS/Windows code and still support async subprocesses to the degree
that `expect' runs, then yes.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Andrew Cagney

References:
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]