This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1

From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
Cc: cagney at gnu dot org, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:51:00 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1
References: <3FFDBE02.2030609@gnu.org> <6654-Fri09Jan2004105457+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <20040109143618.GA32690@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>

> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:36:18 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> > 
> >   http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2003-12/msg00271.html
> > 
> > Does it sound like a GCC bug?
> 
> No idea without more information.  Did you ever get dwarfdump to work
> on COFF?

dwarfdump has no hope of ever running on a platform that doesn't
support ELF, at least as an option, since dwarfdump needs libelf to be
built.

I still have plans to build it on GNU/Linux and try to use it against
the binary that gave me trouble on that box; I don't know if it will
be of any use, though.

Are you saying that this problem never happened on an ELF platform,
like on GNU/Linux?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

References:
- GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: GCC 3.4 vs GDB 6.1
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]