Re: remote protocol support for TARGET_OBJECT_AUXV

[Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>]

> > Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:34:16 -0500
> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> >
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does anybody know what's the story here, why ENN is printed and what
> > > > > it should be?  Is this perhaps a bug?
> >
> > > It predates my work with gdbserver.  My guess is that someone saw ENN
> > > in the manual, realized that GDB didn't parse the error numbers to do
> > > anything useful, and decided not to bother coming up with some.
>
>
> If so, I think we should simply remove the ENN thing (and update the
> docs accordingly).  It doesn't make sense, IMHO, to print a string
> that has no useful meaning.

Er, no.  "Enn" as a reply packet is a fundamental part of the protocol 
and can't be removed.  Whats lacking is the formal specification of its 
contents.  For the moment I'd leave that part of roland's doco as is.

Andrew