This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb 6.0
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- To: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
- Cc: John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, carlos at baldric dot uwo dot ca,dave dot anglin at nrc-cnrc dot gc dot ca, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:16:03 -0500
- Subject: Re: gdb 6.0
- References: <200403011842.i21IgqKa021349@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca> <40439982.8010407@gnu.org>
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 03:13:54PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >>Yes, and HP/UX support in the current CVS source is pretty good;
>
> I wouldn't go that far (I can get away with saying that 'cos its been me
> hacking on it :-). The 32-bit PA support is, lets say, "functional".
>
> >> but
> >> the PA Linux patches will not apply without some serious work.
>
> >I have some cleanups for HP/UX which I can now submit as my gdb
> >paperwork is now complete. I did a build last night and a few new
> >warnings have appeared since early Jan.
> >
> >Carlos had offered to work on getting the debian PA Linux patches
> >integrated.
>
> Can I suggest worrying about -nat changes? As Daniel hints, anything to
> hppa-tdep.c is probably no longer applicable (or needs serious thought).
These patches didn't use hppa-tdep.c at all - they created a parallel
pa-tdep.c without HP/UX support. Beyond that I have absolutely zero
idea what the differences are.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer