This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Phasing out Dwarf 1?


I would like to phase out support for the Dwarf 1 debug format.

I did some research and wrote the results as comments in dwarfread.c.
I found reports from gdb users with three different compilers mentioned:

  gcc
  diab
  absoft

I believe that you've already demonstrated that there are no dwarf-1 cross compilers left (they've all migrated to dwarf-2).


That just leaves us with dwarf-1 systems. How many dwarf-1 systems does GDB still support? If we've also eliminated all our dwarf-1 systems, there's little sense in retaining dwarf-1 support.

(we might also determine that such systems require an ISO-C compiler (e.g., GCC) to build GDB and hence argue that GDB can assume dwarf-2 is present.)

All of these compilers now have released versions with dwarf-2 support.
gcc 3.4.0 has no more dwarf-1 at all.

For the moment lets get the technical argument straight.


Andrew



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]