This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: representing C++ constructors in GDB's symbol tables

From: David Carlton <david dot carlton at sun dot com>
To: Michael Chastain <mec dot gnu at mindspring dot com>
Cc: jimb at redhat dot com, David dot Carlton at sun dot com, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:35:55 -0700
Subject: Re: representing C++ constructors in GDB's symbol tables
References: <vt2pt4ko6p7.fsf@zenia.home><yf2ekl0a0ra.fsf@kealia.sfbay.sun.com><414B9D8B.nailB2O11AVBZ@mindspring.com>

On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 22:29:31 -0400, Michael Chastain <mec.gnu@mindspring.com> said:
> David Carlton <david.carlton@sun.com> wrote:

>> You can use "X(...)" to create a temporary object of type X.

> Sure.  And of course:

>   X my_x = X();

(But not "X my_x();", the C++ geek in me feels compelled to point
out. :-) )

David Carlton
david.carlton@sun.com

References:
- representing C++ constructors in GDB's symbol tables
  - From: Jim Blandy
- Re: representing C++ constructors in GDB's symbol tables
  - From: David Carlton
- Re: representing C++ constructors in GDB's symbol tables
  - From: Michael Chastain

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]