This is the mail archive of the gdb@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Rich Coe <Richard dot Coe at med dot ge dot com>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 16:33:44 -0400
Subject: Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
References: <20050610193720.GA24094@nevyn.them.org> <200506102115.QAA91634@morpheus> <20050611005113.GA29491@nevyn.them.org> <20050611022148.GA14914@lucon.org> <20050613101629.4f54fde1@godzilla> <20050613152646.GB11261@lucon.org> <20050613103412.16e73c25@godzilla> <20050613201350.GA15678@lucon.org> <20050613201635.GA4684@nevyn.them.org> <20050613203046.GA15935@lucon.org>

On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:30:46PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> He was using gdb 6.3, not gdb head. See
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2005-06/msg00114.html

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2005-06/msg00094.html

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

References:
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: richard . coe
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Rich Coe
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Rich Coe
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: no stack trace with 2.6.11 and gdb 6.3
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]