This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI error messages
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on
> elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=3.1.0
> X-From_: gdb-return-24220-m.m.kettenis=alumnus.utwente.nl@sourceware.org Fri Feb 10 16:00:26 2006
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:59:50 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> Content-Disposition: inline
> X-IsSubscribed: yes
> Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
> Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact helpdesk@ITBE.utwente.nl for more information.
> X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-MailScanner-From: gdb-return-24220-m.m.kettenis=alumnus.utwente.nl@sourceware.org
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 05:03:34PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > On Friday 10 February 2006 16:47, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 01:54:08PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > > > From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> > > > > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:35:08 +0300
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Is it guaranteed that all MI error message start with function name
> > > > > and a semicolon?
> > > >
> > > > I see a small number of error messages that don't, but those are
> > > > probably bugs that need to be fixed.
> > >
> > > Really? Why? I don't think the function name adds much value in
> > > user-level error messages. Internal errors, sure.
> >
> > Does it mean that function names should be removed from error messages to
> > user?
>
> I have no idea. Personally, I think they should be.
I agree.
Mark