This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: MI error messages
On 2/10/06, Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> The only way we can ever be consistent is by removing them. Function
> names are an implementation detail. What if we reorganize the code a
> bit, changing the function name. Should we change the error message?
> Or leave it as is, such that it no longer refers to the function that
> actually prints that message?
I think this is right. These GDB function names have no place in a protocol.