This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: MI: reporting of multiple breakpoints


> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:56:45 -0500
> From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
> Cc: eliz@gnu.org, ghost@cs.msu.su, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> However, the fact that some architectures have imprecise watchpoints
> is no reason to force imprecision on those that can do better.

What do you mean by ``do better''?  Should we back up PC to the
instruction that triggered the watchpoint?  If we do, then when we
continue, the watchpoint will trigger again and again, ad nauseam.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]