This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: printing wchar_t*
> Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 10:18:10 -0700
> From: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@red-bean.com>
>
> I much prefer LVAL@@ to LVAL@0.
Agreed.
> I don't think it's worth complicating the syntax for searching for a
> zero terminator in order to allow one to search for an arbitrary
> terminator.
Then how will you find the zero terminator? With wcslen? That is
only good for wchar_t strings, not for arbitrary integer arrays. And
I thought Daniel was suggesting something more general than just
wchar_t arrays.
> I think that will require more typing in the much more common case
??? What typing? I suggested an additional command that will set the
terminator; after that, it's the same typing as with zero.