This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: invoking GDB from FE and signals


On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:43:14PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 03:17:14PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 02:18:21PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> > > OK, here's what happens from the FE perspective though. You type ^c. The
> > > FE get's the signal (which is in a different process group than GDB),
> > > and passes the signal to GDB with 'kill (gdb_pid, SIGINT)'.
> > 
> > Jim just explained this, but it may not have been clear: that is the
> > wrong way to forward the signal.  If you are running GDB on a
> > pseudo-tty, you need to forward the job control signal to that TTY, not
> > to the GDB process itself.
> > 
> > I don't really know how to do that.  Is it by setting BRKING in
> > termios?  There's something about TIOCSIGNAL too.  Lots of code for
> > this in emacs.
> 
> I'm totally confused. I'm certainly not an expert, but sending a signal
> can only be done to a pid using kill. What other ways are there?

Read it again :-)

You don't want to send the signal to a specific process.  You want to
cause the pseudo-terminal to signal the correct process group.

(Also, process group != pid; you can kill negative pids, see a POSIX
reference).

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]