This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Instrcutions that must not be stepped.


On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 16:17 -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> >>>>> "PAUL" == PAUL GILLIAM <pgilliam@us.ibm.com> writes:
> 
>  >> By the way, if stepping these atomic sequences proves to be a
>  >> performance problem, you might want to consider implementing
>  >> stepping them in the (Linux) kernel.
> 
>  PAUL> This would be cool.  It would be nice to be able to tell if the
>  PAUL> kernel has support for this and let it handle atomic sequences
>  PAUL> if it does.  Let GDB handle it if the kernel doesn't.
> 
> Similarly, in remote debugging, there should be a way to have the stub
> handle it.  That means you may need some extensions to the stub
> protocol to encode some new information...

Perhaps something in "qSupported" stuff Danial Jacobowitz is working on?

-=# Paul #=-


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]