This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New Ada failure


> > I am not sure why you stripped your libgnat.so. From your other messages,
> > it sounds like something that you must do. At least with GNAT Pro,
> > the runtime is built at -O2 and without -g, except for a few select units
> > which are deliberately built with -g (and often -O1 instead of -O2).
> > To us, if you strip the runtime, then you break the compiler-debugger
> > interface.
> > 
> > Would you consider not stripping libgnat.so?
> 
> Not up to me - I have Debian's gnat packages installed.  Is this
> documented, i.e. it should be considered a bug in those packages?

As far as I am concerned, I think it should be considered a bug.
However, I am not sure it is documented. Is there a speciic place where
it should be documented? Perhaps in the INSTALL or README of GCC?
I'll ask around at AdaCore.

-- 
Joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]