Re: `processor' command

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>]

> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 07:54:43 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 05:05:53PM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote:
> > 
> > The manual says:
> > 
> > `set processor'
> > `processor'
> >      These are alias commands for, respectively, `set architecture' and
> >      `show architecture'.
> > 
> > The command `processor' doesn't work for me.  As it's an alias anyway how about
> > getting rid of it?
> 
> I guess it was supposed to be "show processor"?  But in any case there
> isn't one, only "set processor" is implemented.  So I think we can
> un-document "processor".

If there is `set processor', there should be also `show processor'.
So I think we should either remove the former or add the latter.

I'm not sure what you meant by ``un-document''; if that means leave a
command, but don't document it, I'm against it.