This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Behaviour of invalid varobjs


 > The testcase uses "**0", not *0, 

Presumably though we're not just interested in the tescase.

 > and I don't see any difference between constant and variable below:
 >... 
 > Can you clarify what you meant?

I can't seem to reproduce it now.  I must have been mistaken

 > >     Also, we probably should include in_scope="false" in output of
 > >     -var-create, but I'm not quite sure.
 > >
 > > I don't see why. 
 > 
 > Because as long as we (IMO, bogusly) use in_scope="false" to indicate
 > "expression cannot be evaluated", we should consistently report
 > that everywhere. 

AFAICS we don't use in_scope at all for -var-create.

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]