This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: 'g/G' GDB commands
- From: Guillaume MENANT <guillaume dot menant at geensys dot com>
- To: gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:45:29 -0800 (PST)
- Subject: Re: 'g/G' GDB commands
- References: <473C1753.1090409@geensys.com> <20071115133842.GB19518@caradoc.them.org> <14437056.post@talk.nabble.com> <14914940.post@talk.nabble.com>
I've made a mistake. GDB accepts my reponse with the '0' padding of one 32
bits register (csr).
Thanks.
Guillaume MENANT wrote:
>
> I've implemented the reply to the 'g' command but GDB sends me a nack
> ('-') each time (3 times and then freeze).
>
> I'm working on a Atmel AT697E (Sparc V8) in which all registers printed
> with "maint print registers" command exists except csr and dx registers
> (last registers listed below). So I tried to send only supported registers
> (GDB sends nack) and also tried to add '0' padding in order to fill the
> non-implemented registers (same response).
>
> How can I see why GDB sends me a nack ? What can I do ?
>
> PS : I'm using sparc-elf-gdb debugger
>
> Thanks a lot for your answers.
>
>
>
> Guillaume MENANT wrote:
>>
>> I've found the register layout for the g/G commands with the "maint print
>> registers" command and it looks like this :
>>
>> Name Nr Rel Offset Size Type
>> g0 0 0 0 4 int32_t
>> g1 1 1 4 4 int32_t
>> g2 2 2 8 4 int32_t
>> g3 3 3 12 4 int32_t
>> g4 4 4 16 4 int32_t
>> g5 5 5 20 4 int32_t
>> g6 6 6 24 4 int32_t
>> g7 7 7 28 4 int32_t
>> o0 8 8 32 4 int32_t
>> o1 9 9 36 4 int32_t
>> o2 10 10 40 4 int32_t
>> o3 11 11 44 4 int32_t
>> o4 12 12 48 4 int32_t
>> o5 13 13 52 4 int32_t
>> sp 14 14 56 4 *1
>> o7 15 15 60 4 int32_t
>> l0 16 16 64 4 int32_t
>> l1 17 17 68 4 int32_t
>> l2 18 18 72 4 int32_t
>> l3 19 19 76 4 int32_t
>> l4 20 20 80 4 int32_t
>> l5 21 21 84 4 int32_t
>> l6 22 22 88 4 int32_t
>> l7 23 23 92 4 int32_t
>> i0 24 24 96 4 int32_t
>> i1 25 25 100 4 int32_t
>> i2 26 26 104 4 int32_t
>> i3 27 27 108 4 int32_t
>> i4 28 28 112 4 int32_t
>> i5 29 29 116 4 int32_t
>> fp 30 30 120 4 *1
>> i7 31 31 124 4 int32_t
>> f0 32 32 128 4 float
>> f1 33 33 132 4 float
>> f2 34 34 136 4 float
>> f3 35 35 140 4 float
>> f4 36 36 144 4 float
>> f5 37 37 148 4 float
>> f6 38 38 152 4 float
>> f7 39 39 156 4 float
>> f8 40 40 160 4 float
>> f9 41 41 164 4 float
>> f10 42 42 168 4 float
>> f11 43 43 172 4 float
>> f12 44 44 176 4 float
>> f13 45 45 180 4 float
>> f14 46 46 184 4 float
>> f15 47 47 188 4 float
>> f16 48 48 192 4 float
>> f17 49 49 196 4 float
>> f18 50 50 200 4 float
>> f19 51 51 204 4 float
>> f20 52 52 208 4 float
>> f21 53 53 212 4 float
>> f22 54 54 216 4 float
>> f23 55 55 220 4 float
>> f24 56 56 224 4 float
>> f25 57 57 228 4 float
>> f26 58 58 232 4 float
>> f27 59 59 236 4 float
>> f28 60 60 240 4 float
>> f29 61 61 244 4 float
>> f30 62 62 248 4 float
>> f31 63 63 252 4 float
>> y 64 64 256 4 int32_t
>> psr 65 65 260 4 int32_t
>> wim 66 66 264 4 int32_t
>> tbr 67 67 268 4 int32_t
>> pc 68 68 272 4 *1
>> npc 69 69 276 4 *1
>> fsr 70 70 280 4 int32_t
>> csr 71 71 284 4 int32_t
>> d0 72 0 288 8 double
>> d2 73 1 296 8 double
>> d4 74 2 304 8 double
>> d6 75 3 312 8 double
>> d8 76 4 320 8 double
>> d10 77 5 328 8 double
>> d12 78 6 336 8 double
>> d14 79 7 344 8 double
>> d16 80 8 352 8 double
>> d18 81 9 360 8 double
>> d20 82 10 368 8 double
>> d22 83 11 376 8 double
>> d24 84 12 384 8 double
>> d26 85 13 392 8 double
>> d28 86 14 400 8 double
>> d30 87 15 408 8 double
>>
>> Thanks for your answers.
>>
>>
>> Daniel Jacobowitz-2 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 10:54:27AM +0100, Guillaume MENANT wrote:
>>>> The chip I want to debug is the Atmel AT697E and I don't really know
>>>> which
>>>> register of the AT697E corresponds to "32 general-purpose", "sr", "lo",
>>>> "hi",
>>>> "bad", "cause", "fsr", "fir"... How can I have more information about
>>>> that ?
>>>
>>> I doubt the Atmel AT697E is a MIPS; it's a SPARC, seems like.
>>> So that paragraph does not apply.
>>>
>>> Configure a SPARC-targeted GDB and look at the output of "maint print
>>> registers". That should give you an idea of the layout GDB expects.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Jacobowitz
>>> CodeSourcery
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%27g-G%27-GDB-commands-tp13764693p14915335.html
Sent from the Sourceware - gdb list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.