This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mi_cmd_disassemble bug?


 >         I have found that when Eclipse call gdb to disassemble the program 
 > from the appointed line in mixed source mode, there is some problem.
 > 
 >         For example, if the program stopped at line 140 in main, then the 
 > user want to see the disassembled codes mixed with C source codes, Eclipse 
 > will
 >        using the following command:
 > 
 >         xxx-data-disassemble -f example.c -l 140 -n 100 -- 1
 > 
 >         then gdb will call function  mi_cmd_disassemble which will always 
 > disassemble from the start address of the function which includes that 
 > line.
 >  
 >         But I think what Eclipse expect gdb to do is disassembling from 
 > where line 140 start instead of the start address of that function.

Why do you think Eclipse expects disassembly to start from line 140?  Does
it not make sense to display some lines/disassembly before the current line
as context?

 >         So in GDB6.7 mi/mi-cmd-disas.c, in function mi_cmd_disassemble
 > 
 >         Should the folloing code be modified ?

Please post changes as a diff so that they are easier to read.

 >        if (!find_line_pc (s, line_num, &start))
 >          error (_("mi_cmd_disassemble: Invalid line number"));
 >        if (find_pc_partial_function (start, NULL, &low, &high) == 0)
 >          error (_("mi_cmd_disassemble: No function contains specified 
 > address"));
 >        }
 > 
 >         gdb_disassembly (uiout,
 >                     file_string,
 >                     line_num,
 >                     mixed_source_and_assembly, how_many, low, high);
 >  
 >         Should it be?
 > 
 >         if (!find_line_pc (s, line_num, &start))
 >          error (_("mi_cmd_disassemble: Invalid line number"));
 >        }
 > 
 >         gdb_disassembly (uiout,
 >                     file_string,
 >                     line_num,
 >                     mixed_source_and_assembly, how_many, start, high);


I don't think this change should be made, if only because it does what the
manual says:

      -data-disassemble
         [ -s START-ADDR -e END-ADDR ]
       | [ -f FILENAME -l LINENUM [ -n LINES ] ]
       -- MODE


`LINENUM'
     is the line number to disassemble around


-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]