This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: breakpoints and symbol examination problems

From: "Brian Budge" <brian dot budge at gmail dot com>
To: "Michael Snyder" <msnyder at specifix dot com>
Cc: "Daniel Jacobowitz" <drow at false dot org>, gdb at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 08:24:44 -0700
Subject: Re: breakpoints and symbol examination problems
References: <5b7094580803101705m7bc6e8ffqa480a74d9b0ab548@mail.gmail.com> <20080311003238.GA14908@caradoc.them.org> <1205196740.19253.809.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Actually, this is already with -O0... at least I think.  I'm not
passing any optimization flags.  For debug symbols I'm passing -ggdb.

I'll try the CVS current top of tree a bit later today.

Thanks,
  Brian

On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:52 PM, Michael Snyder <msnyder@specifix.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 20:32 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>  > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:05:17PM -0700, Brian Budge wrote:
>  >
>
> > > Additionally, I can't seem to examine any "stack" variables once in
>  > > these template functions.  I can see member variables, global
>  > > variables, and function parameters.
>  >
>  > This may be fixed, or it may be a compiler bug.  GCC is not very good
>  > about emitting local variable information in optimized code.
>
>  Can you compile with -O0?
>
>
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: breakpoints and symbol examination problems
  - From: Brian Budge

References:
- breakpoints and symbol examination problems
  - From: Brian Budge
- Re: breakpoints and symbol examination problems
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: breakpoints and symbol examination problems
  - From: Michael Snyder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]