This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Move GDB to C++ ?

From: Andrew Cagney <cagney at gnu dot org>
To: Stan Shebs <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>, gdb at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:19:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <200807101901.m6AJ1UMQ007185@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <488F4AA7.7060001@gnu.org> <g6njvp$2al$1@ger.gmane.org> <ufxpspkwb.fsf@gnu.org> <488F70E6.7060801@earthlink.net> <uzlnznt4d.fsf@gnu.org> <4890B6BB.7010603@earthlink.net>

Stan Shebs wrote:

if you use function dispatching to iterate, you blow your optimization opportunities in code that is known to be time-critical.

Not having to kludge up indirect dispatch would be nice for a number of reasons, performance is not one of them. It's like adding "inline" because we think that will fix a not spot.

References:
- Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Mark Kettenis
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Andrew Cagney
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Vladimir Prus
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Eli Zaretskii
- Re: Move GDB to C++ ?
  - From: Stan Shebs

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]