"Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
Tom> My summary of the discussion is that someone will have to dig into the
Tom> problem in depth. My understanding is that Ulrich does not like that
Tom> patch. But, neither of us knows enough about this part of gdb to say
Tom> what it may be doing wrong.
Daniel> I don't suppose you can be any more specific? I agree that the
Daniel> dl-load.c bit is ugly, but at least the other portion seems clearly
Daniel> correct and I don't understand how the fault token shifted back to
Daniel> GDB.
The above really does convey the gist of our conversation.
I'm somewhat uncomfortable trying to act as an intermediary in a
discussion where I really know nothing about the problem. I will try
to educate myself a bit so I can come up with good followup questions.