This is the mail archive of the
gdb@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: Discussing the next GDB release (GDB 7.0?)
Thanks Joel,
About process record, there were a lot of discussion with it and most
of them were fixed.
So in the third time submit, I think most parts of process record are
OK. But after that, I didn't get approve (I just got the approve of
doc from Eli).
And I think "catch syscall" meet the same problem too. Sérgio send 3
PINGs for third submit.
Please help us with it.
The follow links are for process record and replay submit first time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00096.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00097.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00098.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00099.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00100.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00101.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00102.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00103.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00104.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00105.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00106.html
The follow links are for process record and replay submit second time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00394.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00395.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00396.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00397.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00398.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00399.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00400.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00401.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00402.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00403.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00404.html
The follow links are for process record and replay submit third time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00125.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00126.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00127.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00128.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00129.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00130.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00131.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00132.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00133.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-01/msg00134.html
The follow links are for 'catch syscall' feature submit first time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00583.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00584.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00585.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00587.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-09/msg00586.html
The follow links are for 'catch syscall' feature submit second time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00016.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00019.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00017.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00020.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00018.html
The follow links are for 'catch syscall' feature submit third time:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00449.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00450.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00451.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00452.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00453.html
Thanks,
Hui
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 11:39, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
> Hi Teawater,
>
>> > Do we need process record and replay in 7.0 release?
>> > It's in submit process.
>
>> And catch syscall? I think it hang too.
>
> Neither of these features seem critical to me, but that's only
> a personal opinion. As GDB Maintainer, I think of my role as being
> the technician that implements the recommendations of the GDB
> Maintainers. If the maintainers think this is critical, then
> I'll add them to the list as blocking for the release.
>
> That being said, this does not mean that they will not make it
> for the release. If they get checked in before we branch, then
> they're in...
>
> Regarding the "process record" series of patches, I hesitate to
> review them, because I know there has been some discussion that
> I had to zap because I was too busy at the time. Hopefully the
> persons involved in the discussion at the time can also review
> your patches. If not, I'll be home by the end of the month -
> could you send me personally the links to the discussions and
> the patches, and I'll try to take a look.
>
> Regarding the "catch syscall", same thing. There was a long debate,
> and I zappped it. Same suggestion.
>
> --
> Joel
>