This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution

From: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
To: gdb at sourceware dot org, Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, teawater at gmail dot com, drow at false dot org
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:20:50 +0000
Subject: Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution
References: <daef60380903021910w3d4e7f0w76f8b732aaa46c37@mail.gmail.com> <e394668d0903040915l7496aa5fpbe734464de56b16c@mail.gmail.com> <uy6vlm7ga.fsf@gnu.org>

On Wednesday 04 March 2009 19:08:53, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> ? show-opcodes -- display disassembly of next line with each prompt
> 

Operation codes and disassembly are different things aren't they?

show-opcodes suggests to me that we're doing to show raw, numeric
opcodes, which IIUC, is not what is being suggested.

"disassembly" suggests to me that we're doing to show
assembly mneumonics, which I thought was what is being proposed.

-- 
Pedro Alves

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

References:
- What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution
  - From: teawater
- Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow inferior execution
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]