This is the mail archive of the gdb@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Learn function name by its address

Tom Tromey wrote:
"Paul" == Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com> writes: 

Paul> I think removing them would be incorrect: they do exist, MI accepts them,
Paul> they just don't work :-(

Ugh. That seems even worse.

Paul> Perhaps add a "NOTE: This command has not yet been implemented"
Paul> to each one?

Or also nuke the non-working entries from the MI command table.
I can't think of a reason we'd want to have non-functional commands.
I'm sure we'd reject a new patch that added such a command.


What about just commenting them out, so that the work isn't lost
and someone may some day implement them?

Same for the docs -- can they be left in the source and just commented out?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]